Madurai: The High Court has ruled that when a Christian priest’s education, maintenance, treatment, and funeral expenses are borne by the religious organization to which he belongs, the funds saved by the priest during his service period should go to that organization.
Deivakumar Arulanandam, a priest belonging to the ABVM Catholic Association in Bengaluru, Karnataka, passed away due to ill health. While serving as a priest in Kulithalai, Karur district, he opened a separate account at the local SBI bank and deposited Rs. 56 lakh as fixed deposits.
A case was filed in the Karur District Court claiming rights to that deposit fund on behalf of the APVM Catholic Association and also on behalf of his siblings Deivanayagam, Joseph, and his sister’s daughter Mary Jamila. After the hearing, it was ruled that the deposit fund belonged to the relatives.
In protest against this, Arockiasamy, a member of the ABVM Catholic Association, filed a petition in the Madurai Bench of the High Court. In that petition, it was stated, “Deivakumar Arulanandam has written in his will that all the assets he acquired during the time he served as a priest belong to the association. Therefore, the association is the heir to all his assets. While he was serving as a priest in Salem, he fell ill and died. The association fully bore the expenses for his treatment.
After a person joins a religious order, he has no personal right or claim over the assets acquired during his religious life. Those assets were created for the benefit of that order. Therefore, it was stated that the orders of the Karur court should be set aside.
The order issued by the bench of Judges N. Anand Venkatesh and K.K. Ramakrishnan after hearing this petition: The religious organization to which the priest belongs has borne the expenses necessary for his upbringing in his early years, including education, care, treatment, and funeral expenses. Therefore, it is clear that the funds he accumulated during his tenure should belong to the organization to which he belongs.
The court did not accept the claim by the brothers and the sister’s daughter of a clergyman to his properties after his death solely on the ground that they were his legal heirs. They are baptized Christians, and they themselves have admitted that once the clergyman entered religious life, they had no rights in his affairs. Therefore, the Karur court order is set aside.
It appears that the relatives of the deceased priest received the deposit amount while this civil appeal was pending. That amount must be repaid to the ABVM Sangam by all three within one month, without interest. If repayment is not made within the specified month, the amount must be paid with interest at 9 percent per annum from the date of the judgment until the date on which the full amount is paid. The judges have stated this in the order.
